CJP protests: London rally against CEC, and what UK law says on slogans

By Prakhar Shahi

Published

India House, the High Commission of India in London, outside which a demonstration was held on 16 October

Hundreds rallied in Parliament Square on 17 October as police kept a pro-Modi counter-protest apart. What is on record, what is only claimed about flags, and what the Public Order Act says.

Original report · Explained

As of 18 October 2026, 20:15 IST.

What happened at the London protest against India's Chief Election Commissioner? On Saturday 17 October 2026, hundreds rallied at the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square against CEC Gyanesh Kumar, while police kept a smaller pro-Modi counter-protest apart, Eastern Eye reported (Eastern Eye, 2026). Claims that Pakistani or PoK flags were waved there are not verified in any report we read.

The rally followed a demonstration at the Indian High Commission on Friday 16 October (Outlook India, 2026). It comes as the CJP protests continue in India; for the Delhi side, read Abhijeet Dipke bail: what the peace bond means as Neha Bora is freed. None of the London reports we read names CJP as an organiser.

What is on record about the London rally

Three outlets agree on the basics: a crowd of hundreds, a counter-protest, and police separating the groups. Eastern Eye said YouTuber Dhruv Rathee called and addressed the rally, backed by Save Democracy, SFI-UK and the South Asia Solidarity Group (Eastern Eye, 2026). Outlook India tied the protest to the revision of electoral rolls (Outlook India, 2026).

Rathee told the crowd it was important to spread "the message against 'vote chori'", Eastern Eye reported. Hirdesh Gupta of India Diaspora UK said the diaspora "stands firmly with Modi Ji and his government."

The Commune reported the slogan "RSS Se Azadi, Modi-Shah Se Azadi" (The Commune, 2026). No police count of the crowd has been published.

That is the verified core. The flag claims are a different matter.

What is only claimed about flags

No report we read confirms that a Pakistan or PoK flag was displayed. The Commune said Pakistani journalists were "reportedly present" and that a PoK flag was "allegedly displayed"; it is the only source for that claim (The Commune, 2026).

Rathee says an image of a UK-based man holding a Pakistan flag was AI-morphed, the Free Press Journal reported (Free Press Journal, 2026). We have not named that man.

No page we opened mentions an Indian flag on the ground. Viral videos are not evidence until a police force or a verified source confirms them.

UK law sets its own test for when slogans or flags cross a line.

What UK law says about abusive words at a protest

Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 makes it an offence to use threatening or abusive words, behaviour or visible representations within sight or hearing of someone likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress (legislation.gov.uk, 1986). The maximum penalty is a fine up to level 3 on the standard scale, and the Act sets out three defences.

A visible representation can include a sign or image, so the test is about the effect on people present, not the flag or slogan alone. Whether any act at this rally met that test is for police and courts.

No arrest or Metropolitan Police statement appears in the pages we read.

Questions people are asking

Were Pakistani or PoK flags waved at the London protest?

Not established. Only The Commune says a PoK flag was "allegedly displayed", and one viral flag image has been called AI-morphed (The Commune, 2026; Free Press Journal, 2026).

Was the Indian flag put on the ground?

Not known. No report we read mentions it.

Can protesters be held accountable for slogans in the UK?

Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 covers threatening or abusive words or behaviour causing harassment, alarm or distress, with a fine up to level 3 (legislation.gov.uk, 1986). No police action has been reported.

Who organised the London protest?

Dhruv Rathee called it; SFI-UK, Save Democracy and the South Asia Solidarity Group backed it (Eastern Eye, 2026; The Commune, 2026).

What we don't know yet

What happens next

No dated next step was reported for the London protests.

More on this story

References

How we did this

We compared four reports of the London protest, from Eastern Eye, Outlook India, The Commune and the Free Press Journal, and sorted each claim into what more than one outlet reports and what rests on a single source. We then read section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 on legislation.gov.uk. Headlines we could not open are not used as facts.

This story was produced, reviewed, edited and verified by the reporter before publication, with AI assistance where required.

Covered by 8 outlets across the spectrum: 38% left, 50% center, 0% right.

Who is covering this story

Sources

What an outlet bias classification means

More on CJP protests

More original reports

Related stories