Kochi synagogue arson: what police say about the Kadavumbhagam fire, and what is unproven

By Prakhar Shahi

Published · Updated

The Kadavumbhagam Synagogue in Ernakulam, Kochi, dated to 1200 CE, outside which a fire was set on 12 October 2026

A fire was set outside a synagogue dated to 1200 CE on 12 October. The accused is in SIT custody for five days; police say suspected terror links are not yet established.

Original report

What happened in the Kadavumbhagam synagogue fire in Ernakulam? At about 2.30 am on Monday 12 October 2026, a fire was set at Blossom Nursery, a plant nursery in front of the Kadavumbhagam Synagogue at Ernakulam Market in Kochi, and police say boards outside the gate were burned (Hindustan Times, 2026; The Hindu, 2026). On 15 October a magistrate court sent the man police arrested, Ebin Paul, 32, of Puthencruz, to five days' custody with a Special Investigation Team (The Hindu, 2026).

Police are examining suspected extremist and foreign links. They have also said those links are not yet conclusively established (Hindustan Times, 2026). He has not been convicted of any offence, and none of the reports we read says which legal sections have been invoked.

A synagogue dated to 1200 CE

The building outside which the fire was set is one of Kerala's oldest Jewish sites. The Kadavumbhagam Synagogue was established in 1200 CE and has been restored several times on the same site, according to its Wikipedia entry (Wikipedia, 2026).

The same entry describes it as the oldest Malabar Jewish synagogue today, with a Torah scroll used for occasional services (Wikipedia, 2026). The nursery stands in front of it, within Kochi Central police limits (Times of India, 2026).

Police have given a detailed account of how the fire was set.

What police say happened that night

Police say the accused arrived in a blue Maruti Suzuki Ignis, poured petrol and set it alight, and that he recorded it on his phone, Hindustan Times and the Times of India reported (Hindustan Times, 2026; Times of India, 2026).

Police arrested him within hours (Hindustan Times, 2026). Hindustan Times and The Hindu name him as Ebin Paul; the Times of India names him as Eldho Paul (Hindustan Times, 2026; The Hindu, 2026; Times of India, 2026).

What police found on his phone is what turned a local arson case into a wider inquiry.

What police say they found, and what they say is unproven

Police set out several lines of inquiry. Each is their account, not an established finding.

Those lines are now with a dedicated team, under conditions set by a court.

Who is investigating, and on what terms

A Special Investigation Team was formed under Kochi City police. DCP Arun K Pavithran supervises it and assistant commissioner Sibi Tom leads it, the Times of India reported (Times of India, 2026).

On 15 October the Ernakulam Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II sent him to SIT custody for five days, The Hindu reported. The court directed proper medical care, and a status report on his medical condition and the need for custody every 48 hours if remand is extended (The Hindu, 2026).

His phones and laptop have gone to the State Forensic Science Laboratory. The SIT is prioritising digital evidence to establish whether a wider network or anyone directing him exists, and central agencies are also investigating (The Hindu, 2026).

Much of what readers most want to know has not been made public.

What is not known yet

Questions people are asking

Who has been arrested?

Police arrested Ebin Paul, 32, of Puthencruz, who is in SIT custody for five days from 15 October (The Hindu, 2026).

Is it a terror attack?

Police are probing suspected extremist links but say suspected international and terror links are not yet conclusively established (Hindustan Times, 2026).

How old is the Kadavumbhagam Synagogue?

It dates to 1200 CE and has been restored several times on the same site (Wikipedia, 2026).

What happens next

Counted from 15 October, the five-day SIT custody would run until about 20 October unless the court extends it (The Hindu, 2026).

References

How we did this

We compared four reports on the case published after the 12 October fire, from Hindustan Times, the Times of India, The Hindu and The Indian Express. Each carried part of the record: the police account of the phone evidence, the SIT's leadership, or the court's custody terms. None explained the site's history. We put those parts into one account, added the synagogue's history from its Wikipedia entry, separated what police say from what is established, and noted that outlets spell the accused's name differently. We did not see the court order or speak to police.

This story was produced, reviewed, edited and verified by the reporter before publication, with AI assistance where required.

Covered by 14 outlets across the spectrum: 57% left, 14% center, 29% right.

Who is covering this story

Sources

What an outlet bias classification means

More original reports

Related stories